Executive function deficits mediate the relationship between employees’ ADHD and job burnout

Polarisation poses significant challenges to societal cohesion and democracy. This article explores how education, guided by cosmopolitan principles, can address these divides by fostering empathy, promoting intercultural dialogue, and challenging exclusionary narratives. This article advances the concept of rooted cosmopolitanism by demonstrating how local cultural attachments can complement global ethical principles by balancing particularistic and universalistic values. Through examples of case studies conducted in Canada, Israel, and India, this article highlights the adaptability of cosmopolitan education in diverse sociopolitical contexts and illustrates how education can bridge divides, promote mutual respect, and foster unity in diversity. The practical strategies include integrating global and local perspectives into curricula, promoting experiential learning to engage with diversity, and equipping educators with cultural competence and anti-bias tools. While resistance to change and resource constraints persist, the findings underscore education’s transformative potential to reduce polarisation and cultivate inclusive, equitable communities. This calls for sustained efforts to embed rooted cosmopolitan principles into education, by providing a framework for bridging divides and preparing students to navigate an interconnected world.

Theorizing from humanistic and motivational literature suggests attitude change may occur because high-quality listening facilitates the insight needed to explore and integrate potentially threatening information relevant to the self. By extension, self-insight may enable attitude change as a result of conversations about prejudice. We tested whether high-quality listening would predict attitudes related to speakers' prejudices and whether self-insight would mediate this effect. Study 1 (preregistered) examined scripted conversations characterized by high, regular, and poor listening quality. In Study 2, we manipulated high versus regular listening quality in the laboratory as speakers talked about their prejudiced attitudes. Finally, Study 3 (preregistered) used a more robust measure of prejudiced attitudes to testing whether perceived social acceptance could be an alternative explanation to Study 2 findings. Across these studies, the exploratory (pilot study and Study 2) and confirmatory (Studies 1 & 3) findings were in line with expectations that high, versus regular and poor, quality listening facilitated lower prejudiced attitudes because it increased self-insight. A meta-analysis of the studies (N = 952) showed that the average effect sizes for high-quality listening (vs. comparison conditions) on self-insight, openness to change and prejudiced attitudes were, ds = 1.19, 0.46, 0.32 95%CIs [0.73, 1.51], [0.29, 0.63] [0.12, 0.53], respectively. These results suggest that when having conversations about prejudice, high-quality listening modestly shapes prejudice following conversations about it, and underscores the importance of self-insight and openness to change in this process.